Greek PM promises to keep Olympic Airlines flying

September 7th, 2008

THESSALONIKI, Greece: The Greek prime minister on Saturday vowed to defend troubled Olympic Airlines by cutting staff with a voluntary redundancy program and transfers to other state jobs.

Greece’s national carrier is under increasing financial pressure after a European Union court ruled in February that Greece had failed to recover some €130 million (US$185 million) in illegal subsidies paid to the airline.

“Regarding Olympic, the aim is to (create) a robust and competitive company which will retain its logo and name but will be free of debts and problems with the European Union,” Prime Minister Costas Karamanlis said.

He made the remarks during an annual speech on the state of Greece’s economy.

Karamanlis issued a similar pledge to restructure Greece’s financially troubled National Railway Company, or OSE.

“Among our highest priorities is the (effort) to find a solution for Olympic Airlines and OSE,” which he said together cost taxpayers at least €2.7 million (US$3.8 million) a day.

Olympic employs around 8,500 workers. Repeated efforts to restructure and privatize the company have failed. Local media reports maintain that about half of Olympic’s staff will be axed.

Karamanlis, 51, was re-elected last year. But his conservative government is facing strong opposition from unions which argue that its financial and labor reforms are hurting low-income Greeks.

More 10,000 union-backed protesters rallied Saturday in Thessaloniki, Greece’s second largest city, where Karamanlis gave his speech.

Karamanlis’ problems have been heightened by the conservatives’ slim majority of just two seats in parliament — allowing government dissenters to publicly doubt Karamanlis’ decisions with impunity.

But in Saturday’s speech, Karamanlis staunchly defended his government’s financial performance. He said Greece had largely weather the global financial downturn with a modest drop in economic growth, from a projected 4 percent GDP increase to a 3.5 percent increase on an annual basis in the first six months of the year.

Key for economic stability, he said, were two major pipeline deals signed in the past year: One project that will eventually carry gas from Azerbaijan across Turkey and Greece to Italy, and Greek participation in Russia’s South Stream pipeline project.

Iberian Air Transatlantic Sale Fares

September 4th, 2008

Taxes, fees, and fuel surcharge are included.
Origin Destination Fare from
Boston Barcelona $ 723
Boston Lisbon $ 750
Boston Milan $ 751
Boston Istanbul $ 752
Chicago Barcelona $ 754
Chicago Athens $ 939
Chicago Lisbon $ 1019
Chicago Venice $ 1020
Miami Barcelona $ 803
Miami Lisbon $ 863
Miami Milan $ 1039
Miami Frankfurt $ 1059
New York Barcelona $ 647
New York Lisbon $ 674
New York Milan $ 675
New York Istanbul $ 676
Washington D.C. Lisbon $ 699
Washington D.C. Vienna $ 717
Washington D.C. Barcelona $ 748
Washington D.C. Athens $ 762

more info….

USAirways International Sale Fares

September 4th, 2008

Each Way From To

Philadelphia, PA Milan, Italy $290
Boston, MA Milan, Italy $330
Los Angeles, CA (LAX) Milan, Italy $350
Phoenix, AZ Milan, Italy $375
Denver, CO Milan, Italy $375
Washington DC (DCA) Shannon, Ireland $240
San Francisco, CA Shannon, Ireland $275
Chicago, IL (ORD) Shannon, Ireland $280
Philadelphia, PA Shannon, Ireland $310
Charlotte, NC Shannon, Ireland $340

More International USAir e-savers……

Arrividerci Alitalia. Bonjour Fralitalia

September 3rd, 2008

Travel Daily News

Last week, as two European airlines – one of them a “flag carrier” – collapsed, few would have noticed a small airline on the other side of the world reporting a profit. It was Polynesian Blue, hardly a major company, but the event was significant in one respect. For many years, the government of tiny south Pacific nation, Samoa, had squandered much of its annual GDP running an inefficient and unsuccessful flag carrier. In October 2005, Australian airline, Virgin Blue, became a 49% shareholder in a new joint venture with the government and took over operations of the carrier. Tourism traffic has increased nearly 50% annually, the airline has repaid an establishment loan from the government and is making money!

For Italy’s flag carrier, Alitalia, which sought “admission to the receivership procedure” under Italian law on 29-Aug-08, comes all the relief of a long term invalid finally facing up to the surgery that can make a new entity of it. A new operating formula can now be developed. There will be pain inevitably, for some employees and contractors, but the end can hardly come as a surprise.

Alitalia is fortunate even to have the opportunity for a new start. That’s because it is not just an airline, but an entrie to the Italian market it has dominated for decades. So, despite the airline’s otherwise unattractive appearance – a battle-hardened (against management, that is) workforce and a weary aircraft fleet, dominated by MD-80s and -90s with an average age just shy of 20 years – at least one handsome suitor remains.

The reported restructuring plan would allow the operational parts of the airline to be isolated, with recapitalisation by a number of Italian entrepreneurs, thus reopening the door for Air France to secure a realistic minority partnership. This time around, the recalcitrant unions will be faced with fewer options, as the alternative to a partnership with Air France will be, well, not much.

Air France has confirmed its interest, following discussions mid-week in Paris. The board announced, with some nuances remaining, that “Air France-KLM confirms its intention to remain Alitalia’s strategic partner. To this effect, and if it can be confirmed that the new company will be profitable, Air France-KLM is ready to take out a minority stake in the new company’s capital alongside the investors.”

Presumably the Italian investors, undoubtedly expecting political sunshine for making Mr Berlusconi look good, will have escape routes if a deal with the French carrier cannot be consummated. And, in turn, if Air France cannot reach a fundamental understanding with the unions, the whole deal crashes in flames. (Despite trying to beat up a bit of competitive tension by suggesting that Lufthansa may be interested, that really seems a bridge too far at this stage.)

So, when Alitalia’s unions meet government official to thrash out an understanding today, they don’t start from a strong position. But they still have the power to undermine Berlusconi’s “miracle” – and that will be their main card. This is where Air France needs to insist steadfastly on clear and effective cutbacks up front, because, once the Italian government has the problem off its hands, the new villain in any disputes will be the foreign airline partner, which, shockingly, seeks efficiencies. And Mr Berlusconi will become the good guy.

Italy is a great footballing nation and there is no more experienced team than the nation’s political footballers. Senior government officials have already begun creating expectations guaranteed to make life difficult for the next owners. Mr Berlusconi has assured there will be less staff sacrifices than under Air France’s original proposal and at the weekend, Labour Minister, Maurizio Sacconi, opportunistically promised (or “hoped”) that layoffs will be less than 5,000, far short of the 7,000-plus that Air France had previously sought.

There are some other threats too. Brussels never likes to be left out of any local excitement and, on recent experience, the Italians will seek to push EU competition and subsidy rules beyond the limit – for example, Air One will apparently be subsumed into the reconstituted airline, some aggressive refinancing is to be done and generous layoff payments are likely to be promised to mollify unions.

Air France has enjoyed a highly successful relationship with KLM, but the smaller airline well knows the challenges of partnership with Alitalia. KLM has been to Rome before and had to go through a costly and painful exercise to extricate itself. Pre-nuptial stars in the eyes this time around will be tempered by that experience. The prospect of lingering disputes with unions, as well as complex legal disputes with Brussels, is not the stuff of commercial good news, while the operating environment toughens for everyone.

Meanwhile, on the sidelines, Austrian, SAS and Olympic should be taking notes. It has taken 61 years for Alitalia to have a hope of sustainability and now salvation is in sight. But you don’t get to heaven without dying first. A remote Pacific island offers some alternative for those who don’t want to go that route.

Footnote: Unfortunately meanwhile, for UK-Canadian private airline, Zoom, which ceased operations on 28 August, it had no government to bail it out. Zoom will become just another statistic, even if a lot of travellers (and one or two small airports) are greatly inconvenienced. Such is the gap between flag carriers and commercial reality.

Heathrow’s new terminal will not be ready for 2012 Olympics

September 3rd, 2008

Heathrow’s flagship new terminal, hailed as the gateway to the 2012 London Olympics, will not be ready for the event.

By David Millward, Transport Editor
Last Updated: 11:48AM BST 02 Sep 2008
Telegraph

Heathrow Terminal 5
The shambolic opening of Terminal 5 earlier this year has thrown the timetable into complete disarray Photo: AFP/Getty Images

BAA, Heathrow’s operators, have admitted that at best only part of Heathrow East – which will replace Terminals 1 and 2 – will be open for business when competitors and delegates arrive for the 2012 games.

After the spectacular Beijing Olympics, the news of the latest delays will be seen as damaging Britain’s reputation as well as that of BAA and its Spanish parent company, Ferrovial.

“This is yet more embarrassment for BAA, which will leave many of their airline customers fuming,” said Theresa Villiers, the Tories’ transport spokesman.

“BAA need to get their act together, not just on Heathrow East but on making the airport better across the board.

“The performance of Heathrow will play a major part in determining whether the 2012 Olympics are a success or not and we need a much higher quality of customer service from BAA than we have had over recent months.”

Last month the Competition Commission called for BAA to lose its monopoly over London’s airports, advocating that the company should be forced to sell Stansted and Gatwick.

This, it was argued, would mean that service standards would improve – and “Heathrow hassle” could become a thing of the past, if all three airports were in competition with each other.

The extent of the delay remains unclear, but it is understood that several major building contractors that work is now unlikely to start until next year.

More than 50 airlines at Heathrow are involved in a complex game of musical chairs following in readiness for the new terminal.

But the shambolic opening of Terminal 5 earlier this year has thrown the timetable into complete disarray.

The next shift should have seen British Airways flights to Barcelona, Madrid, Lisbon, Nice and Helsinki move from Terminal 1 to Terminal 3 in just over a fortnight.

This will now not take place until next January. Other airlines to find their plans scrapped include Lufthansa, which has made little secret of its annoyance and has hinted that it could take legal action.

Heathrow is now considering an array of options alleviate the problems it faces.

The most dramatic change will see the creation of a second satellite building at Terminal 5 by 2010 – at least two earlier than previously planned.

This has been done after British Airways projections were re-evaluated, with the airport predicting that demand will be heavier than previously.

A spokesman for BAA said that other terminals had not been ignored. “All of our terminals are being refurbished and we hope to have at least part of Terminal East ready in 2012.”

American Airlines International Sale Fares

September 3rd, 2008

International Weekend Getaway Fares

Travel Dates & Times for Weekend Getaway Fares

Depart anytime between Tuesday, September 9, 2008, and Friday, September 12, 2008.
Return anytime between Monday, September 15, 2008, and Wednesday, September 17, 2008.
Tickets must be purchased by this Sunday, September 7, 2008, 11:59 p.m. (CT).
Fares displayed are for round-trip coach class travel.

Round Trip Fare

Boston, MA (BOS) – London Heathrow, United Kingdom (LHR) $547
Dallas / Ft. Worth, TX (DFW) – Aguascalientes, Mexico (AGU) $445
Ft. Lauderdale, FL (FLL) – San Jose, Costa Rica (SJO) $158
Miami, FL (MIA) – Guatemala City, Guatemala (GUA) $158
Miami, FL (MIA) – Managua, Nicaragua (MGA) $158
Miami, FL (MIA) – Mexico City, Mexico (MEX) – $330
Miami, FL (MIA) – Panama City, Panama (PTY) $158
Miami, FL (MIA) – San Jose, Costa Rica (SJO) $158
Miami, FL (MIA) – San Pedro Sula, Honduras (SAP) $158
New York Kennedy, NY (JFK) – London Heathrow, United Kingdom (LHR) $527
San Juan, PR (SJU) – Anguilla, Anguilla (AXA) $334
San Juan, PR (SJU) – Fort de France, Martinique (FDF) $425

*Taxes, fees and conditions apply.

Additional Fees and
Restrictions May Apply

Visit www.aa.com/netsaaver for additional fare offers for this weekend and other travel dates.

Virgin Atlantic ready to take on BA

August 31st, 2008

By Mark Kleinman
Last Updated: 1:26am BST 31/08/2008
The Telegraph

Sir Richard Branson’s Virgin Atlantic has engaged heavyweight City advisers to engineer its role in a round of airline industry consolidation likely to be fuelled by the high oil price and an increasingly tough operating environment.

People close to Virgin Atlantic say that Credit Suisse had been hired by the company some time ago and that no talks are currently being held between Branson, who is Virgin Atlantic’s president, and either BMI, its smaller rival, or BMI’s second-biggest shareholder, Lufthansa.
advertisement

However, the recruitment of a leading investment bank to provide counsel on a prospective change of ownership at BMI reflects Branson’s determination that Virgin Atlantic should play a prominent role in future aviation sector takeovers.

In an exclusive interview with The Sunday Telegraph, Branson reiterated his belief that a combination of Virgin Atlantic and BMI would represent an obvious next step in the long-term consolidation of an industry which only on Friday saw another transatlantic carrier, Zoom, collapse, leaving thousands of passengers stranded.

“There is considerable logic in Virgin and BMI working as one. We do not overlap on routes, [and a merger] would give us a good short-haul network and give them a good long-haul network. By doing that it would create a more formidable competitor to British Airways,” he said.

BMI’s future ownership has been the subject of ongoing speculation for years, but it has intensified in recent months because a put option for Sir Michael Bishop’s 50 per cent plus one share, which allows him to sell his stake to the German flag-carrier at a pre-determined, although undisclosed price, expires next year.

Bishop has declined to comment in detail about the arrangement with Lufthansa, which also has a call option on his stake that becomes effective in December and lasts until June 2009.

BMI is seen by analysts as a particularly valuable business because of its ownership of the second-highest number of take-off and landing slots at Heathrow Airport after BA.

“We are watching the situation. Michael really doesn’t have anything to do with BMI any more in that he has effectively given up a decision to Lufthansa over future ownership,” said Branson.
# More on transport

Speaking from a holiday on the island of Necker this weekend, Branson attacked the “monster monopoly” which he argues would be created by the approval of an alliance between BA, his long-standing bête noire, and American Airlines. The proposed tie-up, which was announced earlier this month, has been rejected by regulators on two previous occasions, and Branson sees no reason for them to alter their stance this time around.

On Friday, the European Commission said that it was launching a probe into whether the BA-AA alliance and BA’s planned merger with Iberia of Spain violated EU anti-trust laws, a move greeted by Branson with typical enthusiasm.

“It is great news, and the fact that they have launched it before a BA/AA filing [to them] demonstrates that the Commission is taking it very seriously,” he said.

Branson’s rampant opposition to BA’s plan to tie up a larger chunk of the transatlantic market has always smacked of pure economic self-interest – he admits that Virgin “will be seriously damaged” by his rivals’ alliance – but he also insists he is adopting a role the British public has come to know well during the last 20 years: that of the corporate altruist, a ruthlessly successful businessman who has become fabulously wealthy by defending the consumer’s interest.

“If Virgin is worried, then the public should be worried. Together, BA and AA will twist the arms of travel agents to give them business because of their dominant share of the market. With the business market, BA/AA will go to the JP Morgans and the Goldman Sachs who will have to use them because of their domestic networks, transatlantic networks and European networks. It will be sheer monster monopoly dominance.”

This weekend, Branson also accused BA of misleading City analysts and shareholders over the likely timetable for securing regulatory clearance for their alliance, referring to comments made by Willie Walsh, BA’s chief executive, that he expected to have it approved “on this [the Bush] administration’s watch”, in other words, within the next three months.

The Virgin president poured scorn on that expectation. Sources in Washington expect the Department of Transport to pass judgement on the tie-up by the middle of next year “at the earliest”.

“We would hope that the next administration is a more consumer-friendly administration,” said Branson, who has written to the presidential candidates Barack Obama and John McCain to express his views.

BA rejects Branson’s claims about the impact of a deal with AA, saying he is regurgitating arguments “used in a completely different regulatory and competitive environment in 1996 and 2001″. A BA spokesman denied that the company had referred to a formal time frame for clearance.

“Obviously, we would welcome it if we were given approval before the end of the year, but if it runs into next year, so be it,” said the spokesman.

Last week, BA scored a rare public relations victory over Branson, the master of the photo-opportunity, when it brought home the triumphant British Olympic team from Beijing.

Yet days later, Branson was back to his own favourite participation event: riling his larger rival. Financial results which looked strong in the context of the climate saw Virgin Atlantic claiming it had won significant new business from the fiasco over Heathrow’s Terminal 5. An increase in business travellers helped swell Virgin Atlantic’s pre-tax profit before exceptional items to nearly £61m in the year to February, up from £44m a year earlier. “The people who defected will stick with us,” said Branson.

In addition to BMI and the planned BA/AA alliance, Branson has the ownership of his own flagship company to consider. Singapore Airlines, which acquired a 49 per cent stake in Virgin Atlantic in 1999, signalled last year that it was reviewing options for the shareholding, including a sale or an initial public offering.

Virgin Atlantic has pre-emption rights over the stake, although Branson said he was unclear about the price his shareholder would be willing to sell at. “They might have changed their minds. I am still interested in buying it from them.”

Branson has other airlines to think about, too. His Virgin Group, where he is chairman, is locked in talks with a potential partner in Russia as he considers the launch of a domestic airline there. The negotiations, which have been taking place since the beginning of the year, involve Virgin buying a stake in Sky Express, a low-cost commercial carrier.

Branson insists he is undeterred by the sense of crisis that has engulfed other foreign investors in Russia, including BP, the oil company, in recent months.

“The West missed a major opportunity when [Boris] Yeltsin [the former Russian president] was in power, when Russia wanted to join Nato and the West turned him down,” he said.

“It is incredibly sad that Russia is not now part of Nato or of Europe. I hope the politicians can make amends. Businesspeople have got to do their best to trade with Russia.”

Virgin’s moves into overseas domestic airline industries have not always met with unmitigated success. The group is considering offloading or reducing its stake in its business in Nigeria because of a dispute with the country’s government over the location of its domestic operations.

In Australia, where Branson is now the biggest shareholder in the listed airline Virgin Blue, he has seen the company’s share price slump this year, not unlike the stock market performance of many other airlines around the world as investor sentiment across the industry continues to darken.

Next week, Branson will publish his latest book, a guide called Business Stripped Bare to doing business, which marks a departure from the string of autobiographies he has published in the past.

One suspects Walsh will not be among those receiving a free copy.

“We’re going to wage one hell of a campaign to stop their deal happening,” said Branson.