In-flight mobile phone services set to take off this year

April 1st, 2008

By Graham Dunn of Flight Global

After several years in the pipeline, this year finally sees the roll-out of services supporting the use of mobile phones and GPRS-devices such as BlackBerrys by passengers in flight.

On top of trials with Qantas and Air France, mobile connectivity providers AeroMobile and OnAir are in the process of beginning services on respective launch customers Emirates and Ryanair. A string of installations on further airlines are expected during 2008.

It has been a lengthy journey. Enabling passengers to use their own mobile phones onboard has long been seen as the holy grail for an industry where in-seat phones failed to generate hoped-for revenues in the 1990s.

Moves to enable passengers to use their mobile phones onboard have been under discussion since the start of the decade.

The hurdles have been many. These have not so much been technical – the use of picocell technology has readily been available to ensure power emitted from phones does not interfere with onboard avionics.

The bigger challenge has been navigating the necessary aeronautical certification and telecom regulatory landscape to support the services, alongside work to reach the necessary roaming agreements with all the mobile phone operators.

These processes have taken longer than expected. Providers and airlines have had to wait while the telecoms regulatory and aeronautical certification processes run their course, and projected timelines for launch of services have slipped as a result.

Commercial Trial

But for OnAir – the SITA-led venture with Airbus – and the Arinc/Telenor joint venture AeroMobile the first fruits are being seen.

The first OnAir services, supported by Inmarsat’s new SwiftBroadband satcom network, began flying at the end of last year on a six-month, single aircraft trial for Air France. Under the trial an Airbus A318 operating across a variety of short-haul routes has been supporting data services – text messaging or e-mails. This is due to be later expanded to include voice calls.

“The trial is not a technology trial, it is a commercial trial,” says OnAir chief executive Benoit Debains. While he will not be drawn on specific results, Debains says: “We have seen a lot of enthusiasm from the passengers.” Further trials will follow shortly on European short-haul carriers TAP Portugal and BMI.

Launch customer for the OnAir service, Ryanair, is set to go live around the middle of the year – initially on 25 Boeing 737s. The project has been awaiting approval from UK telecoms regulator Ofcom – which was granted on 26 March following completion of a consultation process – to secure the necessary regulatory approval as Ryanair plans to initially deploy the service on London Stansted-based aircraft.

“We [have] all [been] waiting for the UK regulatory approval and because Ryanair wants to start with a fleet of 25 aircraft,” says Debains. “Then by July/August we should have Shenzhen Airlines. There we have a simple deadline, the Olympic Games,” he says. The Chinese carrier wants to have the service up and running on a couple of aircraft to operate domestic flights in time for the games in Beijing.

Other customers so far announced by OnAir include India’s Kingfisher Airlines, Malaysia’s AirAsia and AirAsia X and Royal Jordanian Airlines.

Meanwhile. the long-awaited start of AeroMobile’s GSM services on launch customer Emirates finally took place in March – enabling the Middle Eastern carrier to lay claim to the first authorised in-flight mobile phone call on a commercial service. The first call took place on an Airbus A340-300-operated flight from Dubai to Casablanca.

The service was launched after receiving final approvals from the European Aviation Safety Authority and the United Arab Emirates’ General Civil Aviation Authority (GCAA) for the Emirates service. Work will now begin on rolling out the service across its long-haul fleet of Boeing 777s and Airbus widebodies. Installations will be tied into scheduled maintenance for the aircraft.

This builds on last year’s trial of the AeroMobile service, initially supported by Inmarsat’s classic and Swift64 satcom services, onboard a domestic Qantas Boeing 767 last year. The three-month trial of data services was ultimately extended to nine months and AeroMobile director of marketing services David Coiley says this triggered market interest.

“We currently have nine aircraft operator commitments – some which we have announced including Emirates, Qantas and Turkish Airlines,” he says. These also include Saudi Arabian Airlines.

“At Aircraft Interiors [exhibition to be held in Hamburg from 1-3 April] we will be announcing further details about new projects and customer announcements,” he adds.

Other carriers have also outlined their intention to enable mobile phone use onboard, such as Kuwait budget operator Jazeera Airways and Scandinavian budget carrier Norwegian – the latter as part of a wider telecoms initiative which has seen it establish a dedicated mobile telecoms subsidiary.

The lengthy development time for the service has seen the prominence of data services on mobile devices become increasingly widespread over this period.

Coiley believes the growth of GPRS “push email” services – most notably through BlackBerrys – have helped provide business travellers with an easier way to say in touch with the office. “GPRS services are something that has become much more viable,” he says. “It reduces the need for VPN [virtual private network] connectivity. It keeps people in touch without using [higher] bandwidth services.

“GPRS is very relevant. But we must look at how it is used on the ground. Voice is still very important. A couple of years ago around 90% of cellular phone use was voice. That is reducing slightly, but is still in excess of 75-80%. So we see no reason why that won’t carry on across the in-flight environment.”

Data Service

Deboins also sees data service playing a key role, especially for carriers looking to use it as a service differentiator. “On the data side we see airlines thinking about the kind of service they want to offer. Data will happen and I think it will be one of the things [airlines] have to offer. I think people see voice as more of a way to generate revenues and data as more of a service.”

Alongside regulatory and certification hurdles, there has also been debate about the impact passengers using their phones would have on the cabin environment. This revolved around fears that passengers would be put off by a cabin full people talking on the phone and by irritating ring tones.

The service providers have consistently countered that airlines can control how they deploy the service – they are able to switch off voice capability or incoming calls at various modes of flight. On Emirates, the airline is asking passengers to switch their phones to silent mode.

“The market and industry has become much more mature and balanced in what is going on,” says Coiley. “You won’t have everybody yakking on the plane,” he says, noting likely roaming rates at around $4 a minute – a sharp improvement on in-seat services where price proved a major obstacle to use – would still be likely to reduce idle chatter.

After the long wait providers believe market interest is growing and expect a further pick-up once the first services are offered.

United Airlines E Fares- April 1, 2008

April 1st, 2008

International E-Fares
Sample fares are for travel beginning Monday (April 7, 2008) through Thursday (April 10, 2008) and returning Monday (April 14, 2008) through Thursday (April 17, 2008).
Additional taxes and fees apply to the fares below.*
From: To: Each-way:
Chicago (ORD) Amsterdam (AMS) $347
Chicago (ORD) Paris (CDG) $400
Denver (DEN) Puerto Vallarta (PVR) $106
Los Angeles (LAX) London (LHR) $221
Los Angeles (LAX) Mexico City (MEX) $111
San Francisco (SFO) Los Cabos (SJD) $116
Washington, D.C. (IAD) Amsterdam (AMS) $351
Washington, D.C. (IAD) Cancun (CUN) $198
Washington, D.C. (IAD) Rome (FCO) $419
Search all E-Fares Book Now

International E-Fares Specials
Sample fares are for travel beginning Monday (April 14, 2008) through Thursday (April 17, 2008) and returning Monday (April 21, 2008) through Thursday (April 24, 2008).
Additional taxes and fees apply to the fares below.*
From: To: Each-way:
Chicago (ORD) Cancun (CUN) $193
Chicago (ORD) Sao Paulo (GRU) $438
Denver (DEN) London (LHR) $301
Los Angeles (LAX) Frankfurt (FRA) $300
San Francisco (SFO) London (LHR) $243
San Francisco (SFO) Mexico City (MEX) $198
San Francisco (SFO) Puerto Vallarta (PVR) $131
Washington, D.C. (IAD) Buenos Aires (EZE) $508
Washington, D.C. (IAD) Zurich (ZRH) $435
Search all E-Fares Book Now

American Airlines Netsavers – April 1, 2008

April 1st, 2008

Travel Dates & Times for Weekend Getaway Fares

Depart anytime between Tuesday, April 8, 2008, and Friday, April 11, 2008.
Return anytime between Monday, April 14, 2008, and Wednesday, April 16, 2008.
Tickets must be purchased by this Sunday, April 6, 2008, 11:59 p.m. (CT).
Fares displayed are for round-trip coach class travel.

From/To/One Way Fare

Barbados, Barbados (BGI) – New York Kennedy, NY (JFK) $488
Chicago O’Hare, IL (ORD) – Dublin, Ireland (DUB) $492
Dallas/Fort Worth, TX (DFW) – Aguascalientes, Mexico (AGU) $363
Dallas/Fort Worth, TX (DFW) – Belize City, Belize (BZE) $434
Dallas/Fort Worth, TX (DFW) – Guatemala City, Guatemala (GUA) $435
Dallas/Fort Worth, TX (DFW) – London Heathrow, UK (LHR) $562
Dallas/Fort Worth, TX (DFW) – Nassau, Bahamas (NAS) $309
Dallas/Fort Worth, TX (DFW) – Panama City, Panama (PTY) $434
Fort Lauderdale, FL (FLL) – Nassau, Bahamas (NAS) $128
Hewanorra International Airport, St. Lucia (UVF) – Miami, FL (MIA) $408
Los Angeles, CA (LAX) – Cabo San Lucas, Mexico (SJD) $158
Los Angeles, CA (LAX) – San Salvador, El Salvador (SAL) $429
Marsh Harbour, Bahamas (MHH) – Miami, FL (MIA) $208
Miami, FL (MIA) – Aruba, Aruba (AUA) $280
Miami, FL (MIA) – Barbados, Barbados (BGI) $398
Miami, FL (MIA) – Belize City, Belize (BZE) $399
Miami, FL (MIA) – Guanacaste, Liberia (LIR) $419
Miami, FL (MIA) – Marsh Harbour, Bahamas (MHH) $208
Miami, FL (MIA) – San Juan, PR (SJU) $168
Miami, FL (MIA) – San Salvador, El Salvador (SAL) $399
Miami, FL (MIA) – Santiago, Dominican Republic (STI) $179
Miami, FL (MIA) – Tegucigalpa, Honduras (TGU) $399
Nassau, Bahamas (NAS) – Dallas/Fort Worth, TX (DFW) $309
Nassau, Bahamas (NAS) – Fort Lauderdale, FL (FLL) $128
New York Kennedy, NY (JFK) – Aruba, Aruba (AUA) $318
New York Kennedy, NY (JFK) – Providenciales, Turks and Caicos (PLS) $246
Raleigh/Durham, NC (RDU) – London Heathrow, UK (LHR) $579
San Juan, PR (SJU) – Anguilla, Anguilla (AXA) $184
San Juan, PR (SJU) – Bonaire, Netherlands AN (BON) $234
San Juan, PR (SJU) – Pointe A Pitre, Guadeloupe (PTP) $214
San Juan, PR (SJU) – Tortola, Beef Island, BVI (EIS) $204
Tampa, FL (TPA) – San Juan, PR (SJU) $168

Additional Fees and
Restrictions May Apply

Visit www.aa.com/netsaaver for additional fare offers for this weekend and other travel dates.

New transatlantic aviation pact takes off

March 30th, 2008

Passengers flying between Europe and the United States should get more choice and cheaper tickets if all goes as officials plan under a new EU-US aviation pact taking effect on Sunday.

After more than four years of often tense negotiations, hopes are high that the new “open skies” agreement will usher in a new era of transatlantic travel.

“This marks the start of a new era in transatlantic aviation,” said EU Transport Commissioner Jacques Barrot. “This agreement will bring more competition and cheaper flights.”

The EU estimates that the accord could provide a major boost to transatlantic air traffic with more than 26 million extra passengers expected over the next five years.

Meanwhile, the deal is estimated to deliver benefits worth 12 billion euros (19 billion US dollars) for consumers and create 80,000 new jobs in the European Union and the United States combined.

The pact is supposed to meet those high ambitions by replacing with a single EU-US accord the patchwork of 21 bilateral aviation agreements that previously existed between Washington and individual European nations.

Previously, six EU countries without such bilateral accords could not even have direct flights to the United States.

The new agreement’s main innovation is that it will allow any EU carrier to fly from anywhere in the bloc to any point in the United States, and then on to a third country, and vice versa. This was previously not possible.

However, EU airlines will still not be able to operate domestic US routes, and nor will American carriers be allowed to fly between cities in the same European country.

“The US-EU open skies agreement is a win for consumers because more carriers will be able to compete in more markets,” Delta executive vice president Glen Hauenstein said.

“More competition will bring better service, lower fares, more destinations and more frequencies,” he added.

The pact will also lift restrictions on which airlines can fly from which airport, having an important impact on lucrative transatlantic routes from London’s busy Heathrow airport.

Under Britain’s current bilateral aviation accord with the United States, only British Airways and Virgin Atlantic of Britain, and US carriers United Airlines and American Airlines can fly routes from Heathrow to the United States.

Airlines not previously in that exclusive club have seized on the opportunity to fly new routes out of Heathrow.

“Continental has waited a long time to gain access to Heathrow and this is a great day for us, as well as for all trans-Atlantic travellers,” Continental Airlines chief executive Larry Kellner said announcing new Heathrow routes.

The route between Heathrow and the United States is a lucrative one, with a first-class BA return ticket costing as much as 7,000 pounds (9,000 euros, 14,000 US dollars).

Heathrow, which lies west of the British capital and handles 68 million passengers a year, is the world’s third largest airport in terms of total passengers.

While BA is losing its grip on Heathrow, it is also seeking to take advantage of the pact by launching a new subsidiary named OpenSkies to fly from continental Europe to the United States.

The new pact also lifts restrictions on EU carriers buying stakes of more than 50 percent in US airlines although their voting rights in a US company will remain capped at 25 percent.

US airlines will in turn be able to hold voting rights of up to 49 percent in a European carrier although that could come back down to 25 percent if there is no progress in negotiations on further liberalisation.

Those talks are due to get underway in mid-May, setting the stage for another round of long and tough bargaining.

Simon Calder: Terminal 5 is a breathtaking display of institutional hubris

March 30th, 2008

BA’s botched Terminal 5 opening is sadly typical of Britain’s transport system

29 March 2008

The destinations may have been different – Norway and South Africa rather than Norfolk and Suffolk – but the breathtakingly botched opening of Heathrow Terminal 5 was the week’s second example of corporate complacency in the face of transport meltdown.

On Tuesday, the over-running engineering works that have lately become a bank holiday tradition brought rail gridlock to East Anglia. By Thursday, the “T5″ debacle had redefined institutional hubris. At the end of a humiliating week, a nation that has historically produced some outstanding travellers is now synonymous with inertia, not mobility.

“Inquire airline” proved the most popular destination on the departures boards at Terminal 5 yesterday afternoon. The only airline, of course, is British Airways, which deployed the vague phrase in preference to the more accurate “your BA flight’s been cancelled, pal, and you’re going nowhere”. Yet until the first passengers had the temerity to turn up and expect to be transported along with their luggage to their chosen destination, there had been nothing imprecise in the claims about the T5 experience – and, in particular, the world’s most expensive baggage system: “Extensive and repeated testing of the system by BA has taken place for six months,” trilled the publicity, “to make sure it is in full operation readiness when T5 opens for business.”

Operationally, Terminal 5 has not proved much more disastrous than the pre-Olympic fiasco of Athens (where Olympic Airways boarding passes referred passengers to gates at the old airport) and the travails of Bangkok’s airport (parts of which have been sinking into the mud east of the Thai capital). The difference is: the unqualified assurances by BA’s boss to prospective travellers.

When Stelios Haji-Ioannou started easyJet in 1995, his policy was simple: “Under-promise and over-deliver.” All he offered was a flight from London to Glasgow for £29; if you got a smile and an on-time arrival, so much the better. British Airways and its Spanish-owned landlord, BAA, have turned that maxim on its head. They promised the best aviation experience since the Wright Brothers, and got it dismally wrong.

The failure to provide thousands of travellers with the most basic requirement of an airport, to allow them to fly, has divertedattention from some of the other foibles of Terminal 5. Arriving passengers who wish to check in for an onward flight are required to travel down two levels to the Underground station before ascending five floors to departures, all in lifts that have no call buttons to push from the outside, nor floor numbers to push once inside.

Ironically, the debacle at Terminal 5 has helped the rest of the airport function more efficiently. Although some terminals have been fuller than usual due to refugees from T5, the fact that BA cancelled an average of three departures and three arrivals an hour during the day eased pressure on the apron and in the skies.

The essential amateurish nature of our transport enterprises was made clear at 4am yesterday. I went to a bus stop in central London to catch the 4am bus to Heathrow so I could hopefully meet some of the staff and talk to them. The bus did not show up. But in a very British way we queued in the rain for a bus that did not come to try to reach an airport terminal that did not work.

Upset, resentful and baffled: that sums up not just the tens of thousands of passengers whose plans were wrecked in the first two days of Terminal 5 “live”, but also the hundreds of staff in the front line. British Airways has its work cut out to patch up relations with its employees, never mind its customers.

At the end of April, the stresses on T5 will double when many intercontinental flights from Terminal 4 are switched. Yet even when all the moves are completed, a significant proportion of transit travellers will still face tortuous inter-terminal connections: Sydney, Singapore, Lisbon, Helsinki and other notable cities are excluded from the new facility. Indeed, one irony about this Spanish-owned piece of infrastructure (BAA is part of Ferrovial) is that you can go to a dozen countries around Europe – but not Spain; if you have a ticket to Madrid or Barcelona, you need to be at Terminal 1. Or 2. Or 3. Life at Heathrow seems destined never to be easy.

Lord Rogers’ elegant steel-and-glass gateway to the skies could have amazed the world. But the chance was lost, and instead the airport, city and nation have amused the world.

New Low Cost Airline from Milan to Greece!

March 28th, 2008

A new low cost airline based in Milan, Italy will be flying direct to Athens, Rhodes and Heraklion, Crete. The fares that I saw were in the neighborhood of 75 euro each way. If you can get a good fare to Milan then it’s worth looking into Volareweb to get you on to Greece. As with all combination flights, be sure to leave enough time between flights to be sure that you make your connection(and keep in mind there is always a degree of risk to combine airlines on different tickets as neither airline will take responsibility for a missed flight on another airline if the flights are not on the same ticket!)

Terminal 5 opening is ‘memorable, but for all the wrong reasons’

March 28th, 2008

More than an hour after arriving at a gleaming new Terminal 5, and still waiting to be reunited with her luggage, a frustrated Karina Lehnen declared: “It’s a shambles”.

On a day that had been trumpeted by BA and BAA executives as heralding the future in air travel, most of her fellow travellers agreed.

Despite 18 months of trials, state-of-the-art computers, 10 miles of conveyor belts and a capacity for 12,000 bags an hour, the first day of operations at the world’s newest terminal had descended into chaos and misery for thousands of passengers.

“The money on this terminal was not well spent, the layout is rubbish and if I could avoid this airport I would never come back.”

She was not alone in her frustration. Hundreds of passengers last night expressed their fury at the flight cancellations and delays that ensued from the breakdown in BAA’s sophisticated new baggage system.

By last night at least 33 flights had been cancelled, while rumours circulated from disgruntled handlers that only 40 per cent of bags were making it to the right destinations on time.

Melanie Browden, who flew into the new terminal from Los Angeles, said that she waited three and a half hours for her bag: “There was no information at all. I asked one of the managers what was going on and they laughed at me, telling me, ‘this is what happens with a new terminal.’ ”

Satyanadan Naidu had flown in from California to visit her mother, who recently suffered a heart attack. Ms Naidu commented that the meltdown at the airport was “enough to give me a heart attack as well”.

Many passengers, frustrated by the delays, walked out of the baggage reclaim without collecting their luggage. Kate Adam, 39, gave up after 90 minutes: “I am furious. Staff have been really surly. They can send my bags on to me.” In the early afternoon, as British Airways admitted a “few minor problems” had blighted the day, a huge queue of more than 100 people snaked back from the flight cancellation desk.

Passengers described the debacle as unacceptable, also criticising the lack of organisation and lack of information that was passed on to them.

While hitches on the first day of operations were acceptable, they said, complete chaos was not.

Robert Looker, newly arrived from San Francisco with his family, was none too impressed after having to wait two and a half hours for his luggage. “Everyone accepts teething problems on the first day,” he said. “The whole concept of the new terminal is the effortless, seamless transition from place to place, but in this case, it has failed to do that.”

Jason Barrow, a broker from Radleet, Hertfordshire, spent three hours by an unmoving conveyer belt, after arriving from Amsterdam. “We couldn’t get off the plane at first because the first set of steps appeared broken. Then, we were told our luggage would be delayed for more than two hours, without any explanation,” he said. “There are a few irate people here.”

One of them was Joan Harpham, who lost her bag during the long haul from California. “When we left San Francisco, we were really excited at arriving in this brand-new terminal. But with all these problems, it is not the nicest reception.”

Shortly before 5pm, passengers waiting in the departure hall were told that no-one would be permitted to fly with their baggage for the remainder of the day. It left many of them unable to travel.

But BA refused to put them up in a hotel. The airline gave passengers a telephone number to re-book their flights, and a message explained that the company was “unable to provide a hotel room during this disruption”.

Its message continued: “If you make your own arrangements we will be happy to consider reimbursement of some of your out of pocket expenses.”

Some would-be passengers bedded down in the airport rather than incur even more costs for their day.

One Greek couple said that they did not want to pay the £200 demanded by local hotels and were preparing to stay awake until their 8am flight to Athens.

The pair, who did not wish to be named, said: “I don’t think we’re going to sleep but we just didn’t want to pay that kind of money. We come from Greece where we have lots of complaints about Olympic airlines but you always think British Airways is going to be perfect.”

One sign in the new terminal said “fast bag drop” — it was anything but. The queue hadn’t moved for half an hour and Robin and Barry Watts were getting anxious. The flight at stake was a to their home in Australia, with a connection in Hong Kong and accommodation already paid for.

“When we discovered we would be flying on the first day of the new terminal,” said Robin Watts said, “we were excited that we would be making history. Now that looks like it’s going to backfire and could be memorable for all the wrong reasons.”

As the last of the sunlight filtered through the spacious terminal, passengers were left with no choice but to hang around and become increasingly frustrated. Chris Smith, 26, an off-duty pilot, was beginning to accept that he probably wouldn’t make it to Aberdeen as scheduled.

“Every airport has its problems but you just have to grin and bear it,” he said, generously.